|
|
Post by ringmasterrob on Feb 27, 2005 20:29:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ringmasterrob on Feb 27, 2005 20:34:39 GMT
In short, a triumph. HStorm relies on the evidence available, trying no to use too much guesswork, just enough to keep the article his own conclusions but still cloesly supported by the evidence. Points out some elements of the JFK assassination I had never considered (I used to think I knew a bit about it, but after reading this I wonder how much I actually did know!) all with a healthy dose of cyncism. For its length, depth and ruthless endeavours to bring this theory of JFK's assassination to light I give this article top marks. Not onl HStorm's best article to date, but the best article on the site in my opinion. Great work ;D
10/10
(P.S: Let it be known just how painful it was for me to kiss HStorm's butt that hard, you're lucky it was such a darned good article!)
|
|
|
|
Post by Naselus on Mar 13, 2005 16:03:31 GMT
It's a good article, even though I don't agree with the conclusions it draws. I'd offer 9/10. Anyone wanting to re-create Oswald's shot, you can buy 'JFK reloaded' for about £3 at www.jfkreloaded.com and have a go yourself. It shows that it could be done with a single gunman, provided he'd practiced repeatedly for several hours a day, was extremely lucky, and his rifle wasn'tr as rubbish as the one Ossy used that day. |
|
