|
|
Post by HStorm on Aug 25, 2005 17:23:12 GMT
* www.freewebs.com/thecritique/article26.htm * Critique's (well sort of) rundown of some of the funniest, and indeed stupidest, bits of journalistic editing of 1999. Insofar as it applies to this article (it is really just a list after all), please offer any constructive criticisms along with your rating out of ten in here. |
|
|
|
Post by HStorm on Oct 2, 2005 12:43:11 GMT
Not really much to say. They're funny and suggestive, but it's just a list, and they are kind of dated too. Not to say that there shouldn't be more of them.
6/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Naselus on Oct 3, 2005 10:34:48 GMT
Just a list taken from funny.co.uk, and while it raises a quick smile, there's not really that much more to it. Good fun, but not anything great; worth the two minutes it probably took to copy-and-paste, but not worth any more.
3/10
|
|
|
|
Post by TheCritique on Oct 6, 2005 13:06:09 GMT
Actually, the list was not taken from 'funny.co.uk', it was taken from a book called 'e-tales', which is full of that sort of thing. The chances are no-one has actually 'owns' this compilation, as its probably also on fifty other websites, not to mention comedy books. And my typing speed at the time meant that it would have taken me rather longer than two minutes to computerise. Anyway, I heard another one the other day, which I think you all might like to hear... Red tape holds up new bridges |
|
|
|
Post by Naselus on Oct 6, 2005 13:38:58 GMT
Well, I suggest you check funny.co.uk before you type up any more. Could save yourself quite a bit of effort, even though funny doesn't seem to get updated any more.
|
|
