|
Post by HStorm on Oct 1, 2005 9:10:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by HStorm on Oct 1, 2005 13:06:13 GMT
Generally accurate and written with a pungent zeal, but a few of the details in it are assumptions and/or exaggerated. It's also worth pointing out that Kilroy-Silk's first name is Robert and not John.
The overall message is quite correct, and it's very readable, but as I say, some of the detail needs reassessing.
7/10
|
|
|
Post by Naselus on Oct 1, 2005 17:43:03 GMT
Generally well-reasoned and well written, but once again some of the facts the reasoning is based on are erronious. Also, perhaps a tad over-long for the subject it's based on, leading it to read a little like a rant again. However, there's more good in this article than bad, and it's certainly very readable. 7/10
|
|