|
|
Post by HStorm on Oct 1, 2005 9:13:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by HStorm on Oct 1, 2005 12:52:47 GMT
Undeniably a very fine analysis, rich in accurate historical detail, and related with dispassionate impartiality. It's fleshed out far better than any previous article as well.
The one downside is that the suggestion for a solution - that the Arabs and Israelis have to learn to live with each other - is really just restating the problem in different words (everyone can see that that's what needs to happen, we need to know how it will happen), and therefore sounds a bit weak.
Other than that, a fine bit of work indeed. 9/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Naselus on Oct 3, 2005 10:18:04 GMT
Informative, well written, and detailed. Possibly could have done with a slight re-draft, as it does read much like an essay answer, and even refers to 'question 2' at one point, but in terms of actual content it's hard to find flaw with it; and it's considerably less partisan than most of Critique's work. The solution he comes up with is admittedly weak, as HStorm says, but then again so's ever other solution anyone's ever come up with for the problem; indeed, most of the time the Western world has generally said exactly the same thing as this article.
8/10, but I'd put it upto 9 if it was redrafted.
|
|
